Institute for Marriage and Public Policy.
Post Office Box 1231 • Manassas, VA 20108 • (202) 216-9430 • Email: info@imapp.org


WWW iMAPP

Support iMAPP
Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

Join the Institute for Marriage and Public Policy mailing list
Email:
Weekly Archives

Blogger!



Wednesday, August 27, 2003

BARR ON FMA: Peter Wolfgang

"In the best conservative tradition" neither the FMA nor the federal DOMA would be necessary. But given the Lawrence decision, and the Carhart v. Stenberg decision that struck down Nebraska's partial-birth abortion law for that matter, it is increasingly unlikely that our liberal judiciary will allow any DOMA, state or federal, to stand for very long. The FMA puts what even Mr. Barr agrees is a necessary "baseline" for marriage beyond the reach of the courts and, short of legalizing gay marriage, gives the states just as much leeway (for civil unions, domestic partnerships, etc.) as the DOMA - which is why some on the Right view it as too loose. All things considered, it's the best option available to conservatives this late in the game, and hardly something arrived at hastily. I doubt Mr. Barr's friends at the ACLU intend to leave his DOMA unmolested if they see an opportunity to undo it.


0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

home | marriagedebate.com | resources | about imapp | contact

Copyright Institute for Marriage and Public Policy