|
|
Friday, December 12, 2003
LAURENCE TRIBE SAYS CIVIL UNIONS MAY BE ACCEPTABLE TO MASS COURT: From the Boston Herald
[Eve notes: This is interesting because Prof. Tribe has said previously--here, for example--that civil unions would not pass the court's muster.] Lawmakers' latest effort to avoid gay marriage by passing lesser civil unions might well meet constitutional muster with the state's sharply divided Supreme Judicial Court, a leading constitutional scholar said yesterday. Harvard professor Laurence H. Tribe's remarks came just hours after the state Senate passed a civil union bill and voted to ask the high court whether the creation of civil unions with rights equivalent to marriage--but not the title--would satisfy the landmark Nov. 18 ruling legalizing gay marriage. While cautioning that nobody has a "crystal ball,'' Tribe pointed to the long-agonized, 4-3 nature of the SJC decision and said civil unions might be enough to flip one of the justices in the majority, in the wake of political leaders' outcry against full-blown gay marriage. more |
|||||||||||
|
home | marriagedebate.com | resources | about imapp | contact |
Post a Comment
<< Home